Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is about as far as I have gotten. I am not sure why there is this > difference or how to fix it. I *think* it may be related to the fact > that IA64 GCC defines TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESCRIPTORS but my only reason > for thinking that is that IA64 is the only platform that defines this > macro and I think that the profiler must be getting callee addresses out > of the vtable (though I am not sure about that and I don't know where it > would be doing it from).
I think to make that work tree_gen_ic_profiler and tree_gen_ic_func_profiler would have to dereference the function descriptor to extract the code address, which would then have the necessary uniqueness which the vtable function descriptor lacks. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
