2008/11/19 Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Following (bit weird ;-) code shows weird case of variadic template >> function specialization, however I am not sure it is legal, (atleast I >> haven't found any wording that would prevent such use): > > This list is not really the place to discuss language issues (unless you > think you've found a bug in g++). The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > is probably a better place to ask your question. > > Cheers, > Ben > > -- > Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Australia Development Lab, IBM > >
Hi, I was suppose to fill bug about, but I am not 100% sure what kind of bug it is: a) gcc should accept this code (I am in favour of this) b) gcc should reject specialization #1 that is why have asked here. I am sorry if it was not clear from my initial message. I am poor language lawyer, but I think that current behaviour is odd, and really couldn't find anything in n2798 paper, that would explain current behaviour. Thanks, Piotr
