On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:23 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > A release candidate for GCC 4.3.3 is available from > >> > > > >> > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3.3-RC-20090117/ > >> > > > >> > > and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from SVN revision > >> > > 143460. > >> > > > >> > > The branch is still frozen and all checkins until after the final > >> > > release of GCC 4.3.3 require explicit RM approval. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Gcc 4.3.3 miscompiled SPEC CPU 2006 on Linux/x86-64: > >> > > >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905 > >> > >> I am testing the following patch. > > > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to the > > branch. I do not plan to do a new RC because of this. > > > > I think > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38902 > > is a critical bug since cc 4.3 may silently generate wrong-code > on x86. We should backport > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg01131.html > > to 4.3 branch.
We can do that after 4.3.3 is released. 4.3.3 is only supposed to be strictly better than 4.3.2 and that bug isn't a regression from earlier 4.3 releases. Richard.