Ok, thanks for all this information and if you can dig that up it would be nice too. I'll start looking at that patch and PR33699 to see if I can adapt them to my needs. Any reason why you wouldn't recommend it?
I will keep you posted of anything I do for latter reference, Jean Christophe Beyler On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: > Steven Bosscher wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Adam Nemet <ane...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: >>> I think you really need the Joern's optmize_related_values patch. Also see >>> PR33699. >> >> I wouldn't recommend that patch, but yes: Something that performs that >> optimization ;-) > > Yes, something doing that using LCM was on my list of "things to do > after fwprop to do what CSE currently does, but better". I never got > round to implementing it, I think. I had an LCM-based replacement for > canon_reg that I wanted to use as a basis, maybe I can dig it up. > > Paolo > >
