On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:23 +0100, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 08:56 +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote: > > > > OK for stage 1 (GCC 4.5), currently pretty much everything is frozen on > > > > mainline, except regressions (I hope stage 1 will open soon, since we > > > > have > > > > monthes of backlog of various fixes and new development blocked right > > > > now > > > > which will be painful to merge). > > > > > > If the ACATS test fails on ia64-linux, that's a regression from 4.3.x. > > > > OK, that's a little surprising, but if it's indeed a confirmed > > regression, then it's fine to commit now. > > I didn't put a regression tag because I don't have access to ia64-linux > but according to Andreas Schwab testresults ACATS was clean on ia64 4.3: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-02/msg01606.html > > And was failing all cxf3a0N tests back in november: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-11/msg01831.html > > Currently they do not fail on ia64 4.4 but I guess any unrelated commit > can make them fail again. Also formally this bug has security > implications since we're overwritting memory, so may be I should > backport it. > > Let me know if you think it's still okay for 4.4 and > if it's okay for 4.3 backport commit (after testing there of course).
After checking cxf3a01 showed up here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg02370.html So I went ahead and commited the buffer overflow fix on 4.4. If it shows up on 4.3 too I'll backport. Laurent
