NightStrike wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers > <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: >> Given the SC request we need to stay in Stage 4 rather than trying to work >> around it. > > What if GCC went back to stage 3 until the issue is resolved, thus > opening the door for a number of stage3-type patches that don't affect > 1) licensing and 2) plugin frameworks, but are merely bug fixes which > would have long been shaken out by now.
No, not at all. The only benefit we're having from this is that GCC 4.4 should be quite stable already in GCC 4.4.0, let's not destroy this one too. Paolo
