On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Daniel Berlin <dber...@dberlin.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:09 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Daniel Berlin <dber...@dberlin.org> wrote: >> >>> Okay then, as the leadership body of the GCC community, part of your >>> responsibility is keeping your constituents (the rest of us!) informed >>> of the status of things troubling them. >>> I don't believe saying "we have given the FSF a deadline to meet in >>> the near future" would at all endanger any diplomacy, and i'd love to >>> see a counter argument that says otherwise. >> >> I am sorry that you did not receive the memo. >> > This is a fairly rude response for something that has been a > consistent problem for GCC developers (lack of status updates from the > SC on issues important to GCC developers). > I've said my piece. It's fairly obvious the SC has no plans to change > (they have no incentive to).
Sorry that I forgot the smiley. David
