On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, FX <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > This mail is a request for some help from our local build machinery > experts... We have a patch under testing for libgfortran to add runtime > memleaks checking, and it uses libiberty's hash tables. So, we now link > gfortran programs with libiberty.
What do you mean by this? Linking libiberty to programs build with gfortran? Note that libiberty is not installed by default IIRC. > We also need to link in libiberty while > building libgfortran (which I discovered because otherwise we get failures > on darwin), by the following patch: > > Index: Makefile.am > =================================================================== > --- Makefile.am (revision 145225) > +++ Makefile.am (working copy) > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ > > toolexeclib_LTLIBRARIES = libgfortran.la > libgfortran_la_LINK = $(LINK) > -libgfortran_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info `grep -v '^\#' > $(srcdir)/libtool-version` $(LTLDFLAGS) -lm $(extra_ldflags_libgfortran) > $(version_arg) > +libgfortran_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info `grep -v '^\#' > $(srcdir)/libtool-version` $(LTLDFLAGS) -L../libiberty -liberty -lm > $(extra_ldflags_libgfortran) $(version_arg) > > myexeclib_LTLIBRARIES = libgfortranbegin.la > myexeclibdir = $(libdir)/gcc/$(target_alias)/$(gcc_version)$(MULTISUBDIR) > > > i.e. we add "-L../libiberty -liberty" to libgfortran_la_LDFLAGS. My question > is the following: is "-L../libiberty" the right way to tell the build > machinery where to find the target libiberty, or is there something more > clever to do? I see that libjava uses a variable named $(here), but I > couldn't get it working in libgfortran/Makefile.am, so I reverted to the > simpler "../libiberty". I see that libgfortran is GPLv2 + exception while libiberty is LGPLv2. I think for statically linking libiberty into libgfortran there may be issues. Richard. > Thanks for your help, > FX > > > PS: the current draft of the complete patch, if you are interested in it, is > attached (it was put together by Tobias Burnus) > > > > > > PPS, to Dominique: this is the promised fix for Darwin :) >
