On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:48:19AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >> Technically Stage 4 is the same as release branch status (just without > >> branching > >> before). But indeed, we should update develop.html - does this need to go > >> via > >> the SC? > > > > We should probably drop current Stage 2 and just rename Stage 3 to Stage 2 > > and Stage 4 to Stage 3 as well, I think this model worked very well in 4.4. > > I don't think SC approval is required. I think that the SC trusts me to > approve these kinds of minor mechanical adjustments to the process > (subject, of course, to the fact that people can appeal decisions they > don't like to the SC). I agree that this is a good strategy. So, let's > go ahead.
The release process is the domain of the RM team, and the SC (at least this member, and I think others as well) has no interest in micromanaging it.
