On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Rainer Orth <r...@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Daniel Berlin <dber...@dberlin.org> writes: > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Joseph S. Myers >> <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote: > [...] >> > If we want to deprecate gccbug in 4.4 and remove it in 4.5 (and so not >> > need 4.5.1 or subsequent versions in this script), there is still time to >> > do so (though not to get it in the first deprecated-features-removal patch >> > for 4.5 - that has already been approved for 4.5 and I am retesting it >> > tonight before committing it to trunk). >> >> >> I think we should. >> We haven't received a bug through gccbug in quite a while :) > > No wonder: it didn't work for quite some time (reports didn't make it > through), and despite several request from me you couldn't make time to > find out what was going on.
This is true, I don't have time to maintain an incoming email script used solely by you > I don't blame you at all, but find it highly > unfortunate to be forced to use a browser for initial submission instead of > being able to use a proper mailer/editor. I'm sorry you feel that way, but I simply don't have the extra time to support a method of submission used by exactly one person.
