On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:30:37AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2...@08:12, Robert Dewar <de...@adacore.com> wrote: > >> What would we have to do to make PPL and CLooG required to build GCC? > > > > Why would that be desirable? Seems to me the current situation is > > clearly preferable. > > To enable loop transforms in -O3. > > Sebastian Pop > -- > AMD - GNU Tools >
Sebastian, I assume you are talking about enabling these optimizations in -O3 for gcc 4.5. Unless the alias improvement changes are backported for gcc 4.4.1, the graphite optimizations will yield performance degradations for the polyhedron 2005 benchmarks at -O3 in that case. Jack