Michael Hope wrote:
(define_expand "reload_outsi" [(parallel [(match_operand 0 "memory_operand" "=m")
Perhaps the problem is that the output operand is an unallocated pseudo-reg instead of a MEM. Looking at other targets that have reload_out* patterns, I see that they have predicates that accept both mem and pseudo-regs here.
I'm a bit confused with the documentation versus the ports. For example, REGNO_MODE_CODE_OK_FOR_BASE_P doesn't appear to need a strict form according to the documentation but the bfin port has a strict and non-strict version. Most of the ports have a REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P macro with strict and non-strict versions macro but it's not documented, isn't used, and might have been removed around gcc 4.0.
The current docs say that REGNO_MODE_CODE_OK_FOR_BASE_P has strict and non-strict variants.
The REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P stuff is obsolete. That is something that could be cleaned up. However, since most ports are both defining it and using it in the GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS macros, it is something that will take some work, and it might be simpler to just leave the macros there.
Jim
