Perfect, thank you!
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Iceman <iceman_...@yahoo.com>
Cc: Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Ian Lance Taylor
<i...@google.com>; g...@gnu.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 3:45:20 PM
Subject: Re: Avoiding REG+OFF memory accesses
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:05:18PM -0700, Iceman wrote:
>
> Ian suggestion worked perfectly, thanks. Can you tell me the macro/function
> name to look up
> to work out the secondary reload you're mentioning?
Look up TARGET_SECONDARY_RELOAD in the documentation. Basically it is a hook
that is called and the backend can say it needs extra scratch registers for a
move, or whether it needs to load a value into another register class.
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
4 Technology Place Drive, MS 2203A, Westford, MA, 01886, USA
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
