On Tue, 12 May 2009, Chris Lattner wrote: > 1. I have a hard time understanding the code size numbers. Does 10% mean that > GCC is generating 10% bigger or 10% smaller code than llvm?
I have a different comment on the code size numbers: could we have comparisons of code size for -Os rather than (or in addition to) -O2 and -O3? If someone is particularly concerned with code size, -Os is what they are expected to use. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
