Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes: > All that above said - do you expect us to carry both vec.h (for VEC in > GC memory) and std::vector (for VECs in heap memory) (and vec.h > for the alloca trick ...)? Or do you think we should try to make the GTY > machinery C++ aware and annotate the standard library (ick...)?
I expect us to write a GC allocator, and use that with std::vector. This will require more hooks into the GC code, but I think it is doable. > IMHO we should at least try without the standard library for a start, > fixing the GTY machinery. If we can't write a GC allocator, then I agree. Ian
