> Certainly better. But I fail to see why a different location would be
> better than the original here. I assume all tokens have a correct initial
> location. Then why is for example for int i; in (int) i the location of
> the conversion a better location than the one of i in the folded result?
I don't care either way.
OK pending tests?
PR bootstrap/41451
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Do not call
protected_set_expr_location.
Index: fold-const.c
===================================================================
--- fold-const.c (revision 153549)
+++ fold-const.c (working copy)
@@ -10134,7 +10134,6 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type,
fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (op0),
TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1)), op1);
- protected_set_expr_location (tem, loc);
tem = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0), tem);
goto fold_binary_exit;
}
@@ -10144,7 +10143,6 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
tem = fold_build2_loc (loc, code, type, op0,
fold_convert_loc (loc, TREE_TYPE (op1),
TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1)));
- protected_set_expr_location (tem, loc);
tem = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, type, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0), tem);
goto fold_binary_exit;
}
