On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 08:58:47AM -0800, Patrick Horgan wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 01/10/2010 12:39 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > > >> Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> writes: > >> > >> > >>> Why do you say the effective type is different? > >>> > >> The object type is uint8_t, but accessed as uint32_t. That is > >> undefined. > >> > > > > Unless uint8_t is a character type, as I understand it. That is > > clearly the assumption on which the code relies. > > > But in the new compilers it's an integer type, not a character > type--from the spec:
A character type is an integer type, so it is quite possible for uint8_t to qualify both as a character type and as an integer type. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se
