Hi, I have no idea what you would like to achieve by this? I assume that you want to add aliases to given declaration without actually creating alias DECLs, just assembler symbol names.
But without the DECLs there would be absolutely no way to reffer to these within current unit, so I guess cgraph don't need to care about them much (i.e. they can just be some list assigned to node or decl). But then I don't see how this will work with LTO, so it seems that creating real aliases should work better? Honza > To fix PR 12909 with minimal ABI breakage, I'd like to be able to just > hang extra symbols off the cgraph node for a variable or function and > have them all emitted together. I could do this with the existing alias > mechanisms, but they involve additional DECLs for the aliases. Does it > seem reasonable to add extra symbol names to cgraph, or should I make > dummy DECLs for them? > > Jason
