Hi, On Tue, 18 May 2010, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 16:15, Sandeep Soni <soni.sande...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 1. What should be the format of representation of the GIMPLE tuples in > > text? > > I liked Andrew's suggestion about S-expressions. I can see that for describing types, maybe. But isn't that artificially awkward for representing tuple instructions? I mean most instructions will look like (= i_1 (+ k_1 m_1)) or (= j_1 (call func arg1 arg2)) I don't see how that is much easier to parse compared to i_1 = k_1 + m_1 j_1 = func (arg1, arg2) The nice thing with tuples is that there's always only one operator, and hence no ambiguity in precedence that needs to be resolved or explicitely encoded via a list structure. Or is the format also intended to be able to represent GENERIC, i.e. deeply nested structures? Ciao, Michael.
