On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 09:59, Michael Matz <m...@suse.de> wrote: > I don't see how that is much easier to parse compared to > i_1 = k_1 + m_1 > j_1 = func (arg1, arg2)
Well, it would make the parser almost trivial to implement. But you have a point, the only structurally complex objects we need to parse are type declarations. Everything else should have very uniform syntax. > The nice thing with tuples is that there's always only one operator, and > hence no ambiguity in precedence that needs to be resolved or explicitely > encoded via a list structure. That's true. > Or is the format also intended to be able to represent GENERIC, i.e. > deeply nested structures? No, just gimple. Diego.
