> However, if I changed the code, but did not regenerate the docs, and you > then picked up my changes, possibly made more of your own, and then > regenerated the docs, *you* would be in breach. (Because my changes are > only available to you under the GPL; you do not have the right to > relicense my changes under the GFDL.)
Just to be clear, I don't believe that regenerating the docs itself would be a breach since NOTHING you do internally can be a GPL or GFDL breach). What would be a breach would be *distributing* those regenerated docs.
