On 02/06/2010 17:22, Richard Guenther wrote:
> template<typename T>
> void mark(const T&) { gcc_unreachable (); }
>
> we might be safe to not miss implementations for something gengtype
> does not handle itself.
Wouldn't
template<typename T>
void mark(const T&) { gcc_does_not_exist_causes_link_failure (); }
do an even better job of that?
cheers,
DaveK
