On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 June 2010 11:32, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote: >> Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> We actually do have an issue with the Bugzilla instance on gcc.gnu.org >>> being rather old, so if anyone with Bugzilla foo wants to donate time >>> and effort, looking into upgrading that might be even preferrable. >> >> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43011 for more details. >> >> I concur an update would be very useful! > > Bah! Someone already volunteered to do it in several occasions. > Myself, a long time ago. Someone else a few months ago, Frederic > Buclin volunteered to help and Nightstrike in that very same PR. The > answer was silence. It is not a matter of volunteers. The problem is > elsewhere, deeper in the (mal)functioning of GCC as a project.
GCC is not malefunctioning. Please do not generalize this way. Thanks. The issue is that the only person familiar with the GCC bugzilla deployment left and that access to the project hosting machines is (obviously) restricted. If you want to help with bugzilla it is best to coordinate with overseers, not to rant about this on any gcc specific list or in bugzilla. Richard. > Cheers, > > Manuel. >
