On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Mark Mitchell <m...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On 9/4/2010 9:23 PM, NightStrike wrote: > >> We would like x86_64-w64-mingw32 to become a secondary target for 4.6. > > Who is "we" in this context?
Sorry, that would be Kai Tietz, myself, and the entire mingw-w64.sf.net project. >> What has to be checked off for that to happen? > > It's not so much a matter of "checking off". It's a combination of the > SC's perception of the importance of the target and the technical stats > of the port. I can raise the issue with the SC, if you like, but, > personally, I'm not sure that 64-bit Windows is significant enough as a > target platform for GCC to merit that status. Ouch. What criteria do you use for that analysis? I will endeavor to prove our importance :) Note that 32-bit windows is already a secondary platform.
