> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: > > We currently have 3 non-algorithmic maintainers: > > > > loop optimizer Zdenek Dvorak o...@ucw.cz > > loop optimizer Daniel Berlin dber...@dberlin.org > > libcpp Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com > > > > Especially for the loop optimizer, the situation is a bit strange. There are > > no other maintainers for this specific area (only middle-end/GIMPLE/RTL > > maintainers); Daniel has never really been active in this area (except for > > the old lambda code and scev which has separate maintainers); Zdenek, while > > not very active lately, has basically written the loop optimizer and has > > always been helpful with reviews. > > > > I don't think there is a particular reason to keep this category, whose > > boundaries have actually never been very clear. > > I thought that all non-algorithmic maintainers were demoted to reviewers > automagically. It would be indeed nice to get rid of the strange > category. > > Consider demoting yourself voluntarily (by applying a patch moving > yourself to the reviewers section).
done; I am not likely to use the non-algorithmic maintainer privileges (whatever they actualy used to be) anytime soon, anyway (unfortunately), Zdenek
