2011/1/12 Joseph S. Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com>: >> I don't understand this code, but what I can do is confirm that disabling >> linux-unwind.h doesn't cause any breakage. Then we could disable it >> untill/unless someone more clued than me ports it to kFreeBSD. Would >> this be ok? > > That makes sense to me.
Confirmed, linux-unwind.h can be removed. > If disabled for non-Linux-kernel targets, the > REG_NAME abstraction may as well be removed as not actually being useful > at present. Ack. I'll send a patch for this. -- Robert Millan
