On 31 January 2011 00:25, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Ah, I did look in the NetBSD cvs repository and the other arches I >> looked at just used _ANSI_H_, I obviously didn't check the ones you >> identified. >> > From a quick look, dreamcast, landisk, hpcsh, usermode and evbsh3 use > fancy header protection guard for <machine/ansi.h>. Should the bug > report be re-opened agaist those arch, or can it be expected that > nobody will ever use a recent gcc on those arch ?
I have no objection to it being reopened, but I don't plan to work on it myself.
