> Couldn't GCC (and binutils) on djgpp set > _CRT0_FLAG_DISALLOW_RESPONSE_FILES so that GCC's routines get used > to expand the response files instead of the runtime's routines?
I suppose it could. I'm not sure how much confusion that would cause (probably little if any), but as long as djgpp users don't break if they *don't* use comments, I don't see the harm in it.
