On Mar 13, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> >> Yes, I agree that this is a better solution. This error was put into the >> linker to detect some overflow conditions for part of the code that expected >> the section number to only be a byte. It is likely that "things worked" >> only out of luck before. > > Interesting, so there is no -ffunction-section type tricks at darwin?
Correct, darwin doesn't support that flag in a useful way. Instead, macho has a (poorly defined and understood) concept of "atoms" that the linker uses to slice things up. -Chris > > Pickling everything into single section seems indeed like easiest approach > here. > The question is who will volunteer to implement it ;) > > Honza
