On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 09:38:06PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> I agree it is probably better to re-code things, but that will be >> impossible do before GCC 4.6 goes out. >> >> We have to make a decision: keep the LTO support for Mach-O in for now >> and recommend a non-recent Xcode, disable it for the GCC 4.6 release >> and for the GCC 4.5.x series. > > Steven, > Did I misread you message at... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-03/msg01336.html > > as it seems to suggest otherwise? We do need a clear answer from Apple > about how n_sect is validated though (per segment or per file). > Jack
No, I'm sure Ian is right. For an intermediate object file (.o file) all sections are stuffed into a single segment, and it also would appear that the section numbers are per file, not per segment. Ciao! Steven
