On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net> wrote: > I see a core language specification, I see a third party library > implementation. > I don't see a unified concept.
I don't see it either. It's just a wish. > if it would add nothing, then we are in violent agreement that we should > not be having the discussion here :-) Not so violent, I've had worse... > A better forum is news:comp.std.c++ Granted. > Yes -- even more so. In fact by the time were having the > discussion today, it was past the status of draft that could be modified > without major disruption: the document went into FDIS status. > Being in draft status does not magically confer appropriateness for gcc@. Ok, I admit that my point went *slightly* off-topic... so I'll leave it here. Regards -- Rodrigo.
