On Thu, 12 May 2011, Piotr Wyderski wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not sure if it should be better handled as missed optimization, > but there is a certain lack of functionality in the GCC's __sync_* > function family.
I don't think we should add new functions to that family; instead the aim should be to implement the functionality (built-in functions etc.) required for a good implementation of the C1x and C++0x atomics support, and recommend users to use those in future. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
