> You are right, I was staring at the wrong place. subreg of hardreg
> should not be there.
You can take a look at PR target/48830, this is a related problem for the
SPARC where reload generates:
(set (reg:SI 708 [ D.2989+4 ])
(subreg:SI (reg:DI 72 %f40) 4))
and (subreg:SI (reg:DI 72 %f40) 4) isn't simplifiable either. H.P. wrote a
tentative patch for the subreg machinery to forbid this. Other references are:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg01688.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01743.html
--
Eric Botcazou
