"Amker.Cheng" <amker.ch...@gmail.com> writes: > (insn 882 881 883 96 (set (reg:CC 24 cc) > (compare:CC (reg:SI 684 [ default_num_contexts ]) > (const_int 0 [0]))) core_main.c:265 211 {*arm_cmpsi_insn} > (nil)) > > > The insn49 should be propagated with conditional const from insn882 > and jump_insn883, optimized into "r291<-0" as following code, then let > pre do redundancy elimination work.
Unless there's something arch specific related to arm, insn 882 is a compare, which won't change r684. Why do you think 0 should propagated to r291 if r684 is not zero? Cheers, -- PMatos