On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 09:09 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > On further thinking about this, I have a feeling this may have something > > to do with the Private1 field of the unwind_exception, but I'm not too > > sure how yet. > > For sure, adding a couple of fields on the Ada side that don't exist on the C > side is highly suspicious. Better get rid of them in any case I'd think.
Aye, then the Ada side doesn't build. Can you see what it is I'm missing? I can't say I truly understand this code, especially that in raise-gcc.c. I do understand there are 2 phases, but I have to say the code as the documentation (even where there is docs) is still very cryptic. I'm beginning to think the whole of a-exexpr-gcc needs to be extracted into 2 distinct files, a-exexpr-gcc (normal GCC EH - as it is) and a-exexpr-gcc-arm (ARM EABI EH). Thanks, Luke.
