On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2012, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What's probably confusing you is the "Don't pay attention to the >> @code{inline} keyword" sentence. > > What really set me down the wrong patch were the comments in > gcc/common.opt, that got me the idea it had something to do with C99 > inline. > > ; Nonzero means that functions declared `inline' will be treated > ; as `static'. Prevents generation of zillions of copies of unused > ; static inline functions; instead, `inlines' are written out > ; only when actually used. Used in conjunction with -g. Also > ; does the right thing with #pragma interface. > finline > Common Report Var(flag_no_inline,0) Init(0) > Pay attention to the \"inline\" keyword
Ick - WTF is that ... I'll fix it ;) Richard. >> I suppose we should clarify the documentation and I will prepare a patch. > > Thanks. Would you please take care of adjusting the comments in > common.opt accordingly? TIA, > >> The implementation is exactly right > > Phew! :-) > > -- > Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ > You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi > Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member > Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer