Hi! On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:42:53 +0900, Kaz Kojima <kkoj...@rr.iij4u.or.jp> wrote: > Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > Kaz, is my understanding correct, that I simply use sh64-elf as target, > > and again the sh-sim board? Should I be setting a specific CPU when > > configuring GCC, or any other customization? > > I used sh64-sim board for sh64-elf. sh64-sim.exp baseboard can > be seen in > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2008-02/msg00056.html
I gave both sh-sim and sh64-sim a try, and -- if I'm reading correctly between all the noise -- there isn't really much difference in the testresults depending on which of the two is being used. > > This means, for sh-elf sim testing, we have a bit too many failures in > > GCC and GDB, and some ld test harness issue. For sh64-elf we have a GCC > > trunk ICE, some section overlap issue, and even more GDB issues. > > Yep. About sh64, I had used sh64-linux as my testing target, but > unfortunately that real sh64 system stopped working after the earthquake. Ouch. :-/ Grüße, Thomas
pgpkq7GpdnHMY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
