On Tuesday 13 of March 2012 17:02:01 Richard Henderson wrote: > So, I've got something put together. I think it should be fairly scalable. > As a test I've thrown in some ARM overrides. > > See > > git://repo.or.cz/gcc/rth.git rth/libatomic > > which is a gcc tree with a libatomic subdir. > > Comments welcome.
is this yet another libatomic implementation better than atomic_ops? http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/atomic_ops/ https://github.com/ivmai/libatomic_ops/
