On 04/04/2012 12:53 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > I suspect there are better, cleaner, ways to accomplish the underlying > goal, but I suppose the gcc maintainers don't want to spend the time > fiddling around with their build infrastructure for such a minor > issue...
Why speculate? I haven't seen any hint on what the better, cleaner, way to accomplish this is. -- Pedro Alves