On 06/26/2012 12:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> May I ask why the decision was made to use ILP32 instead of L64P32? The
>> latter would seem to avoid lots of porting problems in particular. And if
>> porting difficulties are the major complained about x32, is it really too
>> late to switch? Thanks - mdb
>
> x32 is designed to replace ia32 where long is 32-bit, not x86-64.
>
It's worth noting that there are *no* Linux platforms that are not ILP32
or LP64, so adding a third memory model is likely to cause even more
problems...
-hpa
