Hi,

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> > You could also do this with an explicit pointer-to-context-struct 
> > parameter that's passed around (and that version of the patch I 
> > posted), but the class-based approached seems nicer to me.
> 
> Are we talking about encapsulation or "looking nice"? In either case, I 
> respectfully disagree -- talking specifically about the patch posted. 
> Having a giant struct with a zillion of member functions defies any 
> reasonable notion of "looking nice", and of "encapsulation."

Amen.


Ciao,
Michael.

Reply via email to