Hi, On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> > You could also do this with an explicit pointer-to-context-struct > > parameter that's passed around (and that version of the patch I > > posted), but the class-based approached seems nicer to me. > > Are we talking about encapsulation or "looking nice"? In either case, I > respectfully disagree -- talking specifically about the patch posted. > Having a giant struct with a zillion of member functions defies any > reasonable notion of "looking nice", and of "encapsulation." Amen. Ciao, Michael.