On 11/26/12 12:46, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > I wonder if "kludgy fixups" refers to the dummy-instruction solution I > mentioned above. The complete dependence graph is a myth. You cannot have a > complete dependence graph for a function -- scheduler works on DAG regions > (and I doubt it will ever support anything more complex), so you would have > to do something to account for inter-region dependencies anyway. > > It is simpler to have a unified solution that would handle both inter- and > intra-region dependencies, rather than implementing two different approaches.
I retract any implication that your bypass proposal is a kludge. I found using bypasses to be very compact and effective. Thanks for the extra nudge. G
