Hi - > Another "problem" with gengtype is that it doesn't know what types can > end up in a PCH. The CFG data structures can *never* be in a PCH, but > there still are PCH writer functions. This is true for many other data > structures as well.
Yes, gengtype does not differentiate between GC and PCH currently. > Should we (as an intermediate step > towards streaming PCHs) explicitly GTY-mark types that should have PCH > writer functions, and not generate such functions for unmarked types? IMHO that's a good idea. -- Laurynas
