> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Biener [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 11 October 2013 13:47 > To: Paulo Matos > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Invalid tree node causes segfault in diagnostic > > > Hmm. We have several places accessing tree_code_name without checking. > May I suggest to abstract accesses to it with a function call which can > do the proper checking and return "<invalid tree code>" instead? >
Sounds good. I will prepare a patch with the change suggested for review. While I am at it, can I patch backends as well? For example mep/mep.c has an occurrence of tree_code_name[TREE_CODE (... -- Paulo Matos
