Paulo Matos <pma...@broadcom.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 11 October 2013 13:47 >> To: Paulo Matos >> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: Re: Invalid tree node causes segfault in diagnostic >> >> >> Hmm. We have several places accessing tree_code_name without >checking. >> May I suggest to abstract accesses to it with a function call which >can >> do the proper checking and return "<invalid tree code>" instead? >> > >Sounds good. I will prepare a patch with the change suggested for >review. >While I am at it, can I patch backends as well? For example mep/mep.c >has an occurrence >of tree_code_name[TREE_CODE (...
Sure. Tree_code_name should be static inside tree.c after the patch. Thanks, Richard.
