On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:19:19PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > And so the problem you're trying to solve is that when compiling the > callee. You incorrectly assumed that if there was not a prototype > for the callee's definition that the caller had set up the save area > and that you could flush arguments to it. That's not true in the > case where the caller had a prototype for the callee in-scope (and > the callee was not a varargs function). > > Right? Just want to make sure I understand the problem.
Exactly correct. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM
