On 09/22/2014 11:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21:14AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
If I say 'rgt dg.exp=var-templ1.C' the actual test results are lost in the
explosion of shell verbosity. Could we add some '@'s to more of the rules,
perhaps?
I've been considering that too, but not sure what info people find valuable
and what they don't.
I don't see much information in the ~128 repetitions of the
check-parallel rules with different numbers; the actual runtest command
is the same in all of them. Adding @ to all of the commands of the
check-parallel-% rule makes things much better for me:
diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index 6f251a5..be4c840 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -3674,10 +3674,10 @@ $(lang_checks_parallelized): check-% : site.exp
fi
check-parallel-% : site.exp
- -test -d plugin || mkdir plugin
- -test -d $(TESTSUITEDIR) || mkdir $(TESTSUITEDIR)
- test -d $(TESTSUITEDIR)/$(check_p_subdir) || mkdir $(TESTSUITEDIR)/$(check_p_subdir)
- -(rootme=`${PWD_COMMAND}`; export rootme; \
+ -@test -d plugin || mkdir plugin
+ -@test -d $(TESTSUITEDIR) || mkdir $(TESTSUITEDIR)
+ @test -d $(TESTSUITEDIR)/$(check_p_subdir) || mkdir $(TESTSUITEDIR)/$(check_p_subdir)
+ -@(rootme=`${PWD_COMMAND}`; export rootme; \
srcdir=`cd ${srcdir}; ${PWD_COMMAND}` ; export srcdir ; \
if [ -n "$(check_p_subno)" ] \
&& [ -n "$$GCC_RUNTEST_PARALLELIZE_DIR" ] \
