On 10/01/2014 08:00 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
-gcc folks.
Why not use clang then?
It offers many more nice features.
What's the Fortran front-end called for clang (or do you really think we
are going to write Weather Forecasting codes in C :-) )
Kind regards,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Toon Moene <t...@moene.org> wrote:
On 10/01/2014 06:21 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
it was certainly worth it.
since I see msan as a kind of valgrind replacement (similar functionality,
but ~10x the speed, partially at the cost of more difficult deployment), I
did a quick search in gcc bugzilla. 982 PRs mention valgrind, so such
functionality is clearly heavily used.
That would be interesting - valgrind is certainly impossible to use on our
Weather Forecasting code (far too large, as valgrind helpfully points out).
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
