On 11/25/14 13:57, Phil Muldoon wrote:
On 25/11/14 20:37, Mike Stump wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 4:06 PM, FX <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
One question to build maintainers, and one patch submitted to top-level
configure.ac
So, not sure who wants to review this. From the darwin perspective, Ok.
I mean from my limited viewpoint it looks fine. As long as the .so is
built, that's really our only goal from a GDB point of view. But I am
not a maintainer, so I have refrained from commenting on this change,
as it seems fairly straightforward. Though I am no expert on GCC
build systems.
I'm not sure there *is* an expert on the GCC buildsystem :(
jeff
