Hi, On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > At least, IA-32 is clear, although IA-64 may be confusing :-). FWIW, > > i386 is also vendor specific. > > Wikipedia agrees [1]: I wouldn't use a wikipedia article that only cites sources from after 2008 (and most of them actually after the after-the-fact invention of "ia32") for an architecture that exists since 1985 as sensible source for supporting either point of view ;-) It totally lacks references to config.guess which IMHO is a much better source of "how to call an architecture" :) Anyway, I've said the things I had to say, crouching back under my stone :) Ciao, Michael.
